Mourinho and chaos - is Real Madrid boss misunderstood?
Barcelona fans have long teased Jose Mourinho, with their insult of choice being traductor - Spanish for translator.
It is their way of mocking the Real Madrid manager's humble beginnings.
Learning his future trade while serving as an interpreter for the legendary Sir Bobby Robson, Mourinho followed Robson from Sporting to Porto, before the pair reached Barcelona in 1996.
Four years later Mourinho was the manager of Benfica, the first steps in a coaching career that would lead him to Champions League glory, twice, and success in England, Italy and Spain.
So much more than merely a translator, even while at Barcelona, the Portuguese boss' wide and varied success best illustrates the true qualities that underpin him - diligent, determined, introspective, able to thrive in chaos, and tactically brilliant.
Last weekend, that eager tactical mind was in full force as Real Madrid beat Barcelona 2-1.
As the footballing world praised the tactics Mourinho used, it was an apt moment to reflect on his 26 years in management.
This Clasico featured Real Madrid playing in a 4-4-2 shape with winger Vinicius Jr suspended.
Federico Valverde played at right-back. Bernardo Silva came into the side partnering Aurelien Tchouameni in midfield. Arda Guler and Yan Diomande manned the flanks and Jude Bellingham played up top alongside Kylian Mbappe.
Like he has often done in big games, Mourinho asked one of his more industrious players, Silva on this occasion, to man-mark Barcelona's Pedri. Not an easy task, but it was one that minimised the Spaniard's influence.
1 of 2
Noting Barcelona's intense press and the fact that they converged towards the ball, Real's players drew opponents on to them in wide areas before exploiting space that opened up on the far side – either through impressive dribbling or long switches.
This was particularly noticeable when the ball was played from the right side of the pitch to the left flank as Marc Cucurella snuck behind Lamine Yamal.
After the match, Mourinho broke habit.
Not one to normally dwell on the tactical details of his game publicly, he decided to explain how it was the deep runs from his midfielders that Barcelona found hardest to track.
A master in using news conference as a continuation of what happens on the pitch, perhaps Mourinho revealed his methods in the hope that future opponents of Barcelona would take note.
By running into space behind Barcelona's high line, Real undid Hansi Flick's famed front-footed approach.
1 of 3
Masterminding individual wins in big games tend to garner Mourinho warranted praise, but his wider approach does not always get the recognition it probably deserves.
In recent years, coaches with more clearly defined tactics, patterns of play, or fixed positional references have been lauded as the geniuses of the sport.
Mourinho hasn't taken this approach, opting for one that leans on the quality of his players and tactics that look different depending on the club he finds himself leading.
This less fixed style is more difficult to analyse from the outside looking in, which can result in misunderstanding his work entirely.
Mourinho is a follower of tactical periodisation, a way of football thinking pioneered by Vitor Frade.
While Mourinho was working alongside Robson at Porto in the mid-1990s, Frade was also part of the coaching staff.
Pulling on threads from psychology, sociology, neuroscience, and systems theory, Frade's thinking rejected the common belief that technical, tactical, physical and psychological parts of football should be treated as separate things.
Part of the thinking behind this was that these factors were not drawn on separately in a match but instead all at once.
When Mourinho took charge of Real for this season, the Athletic reported that training sessions had become shorter but more intense, always carrying a focus on the ball.
Even getting players match fit was a job done with the ball at their feet.
In football, coaches seem to veer one of two ways.
Some look to minimise the effect of a match's chaos while others - including followers of tactical periodisation - accept and adapt to it.
Mourinho started his career as impressively as anyone, winning the Uefa Cup and Champions League with Porto, turning Chelsea into a dominant force in England, guiding Inter to a treble and then winning La Liga at Real Madrid.
But between 2019 and 2025, he took jobs at teams with more modest expectations compared to his earlier work.
Since EFL Cup and Europa League success at Manchester United in 2017, Mourinho's only trophy has been the Conference League he won in 2022 with Roma.
During that decade it was the coaches who minimised chaos that thrived.
As fans watched 'chess-like' matches, successful coaches looked to keep lots of the ball, setting their team up in predictable and symmetrical shapes with fixed player roles, such as touchline wingers or inverted full-backs.
Opponents often defended in a zonal manner, as players blocked specific areas of the pitch.
This allowed the attacking team to plan to move players into areas that gave them overloads on the pitch.
In recent seasons, there has been a rise in man-to-man pressing which has removed the ability for teams to find overloads. Pressing puts pressure on the attackers on the ball which hurries their decisions, too.
This has made games look more chaotic, which may be to Mourinho's benefit.
Students of Frade believe chaos is inseparable from the game. By training in a holistic manner, the hope is that players become better equipped to solve problems on the fly.
Perhaps this is why Mourinho's teams have typically thrived in difficult conditions, as underdogs, when the stakes have been high, or when games move away from pre-planned patterns.
Mourinho doesn't seek to control every decision his players make but instead looks to prepare them to find solutions for themselves; with better players, these solutions should, in theory, be better.
It's why, against Barcelona, we saw excellent footballers in Bellingham, Mbappe and Silva excel, all playing in their own unique style, but in a way that came together – when the stakes were highest.
Mbappe attacked the last line and finished moves. Bellingham was combative in duels and elegant on the ball to dribble past players. And Silva slowed down the game under Barcelona's press, before getting the ball to his team-mates higher up the pitch once the opposition had committed.
Mourinho embodies the sequel. He began his managerial career at Benfica, returning 25 years later in September 2025.
He won back-to-back league titles at Chelsea, before returning six years after his departure to win a third. And now, 13 years on from his first tenure at the Bernabeu, a second spell at Real Madrid.
It is fitting, then, that the changing footballing landscape might be offering him another sequel, this time in his tactical approach.
Related topics
Read more tactical analysis from Umir Irfan
Is Premier League possession football on the way out?
Breaking down Man Utd's tactics after Fernandes' criticism
Matos on tactics, Klopp's influence, and taking Swans to top of league
Tuchel's England 2.0: What has changed?